Category: Comics

30 Jun by Joseph Barnett

Spider-Man – Le super-héros improbable

Il est gênant dans le monde popularisé actuel de ne pas connaître Spider-Man. De plus, cela ne fait aucune différence que vous ayez de jeunes jeunes, que vous soyez à l'école ou comme moi ... vous êtes aussi "vieux que la terre", nous avons tous été présentés à ce super-héros le plus improbable de tous. ". Quoi qu'il en soit, s'il est tout sauf un héros incroyable, pourquoi sa notoriété s'est-elle développée depuis le moment où il a été présenté pour la première fois en 1962? Il semble que nous ne pouvons pas en avoir assez de lui. Essayez de ne pas vous méprendre, je suis également un passionné extraordinaire de lui, mais Spider-Man (nom authentique: Peter Parker) n'est pas votre héros commun. Je m'aventurerais même à un tel point extrême pour dire qu'il a même du mal à comprendre ce qu'est vraiment un surhumain. Bug Man a des "forces inhabituelles" - comme avoir la possibilité de coller à n'importe quelle surface, des réflexes "arachnides rapides" qui fonctionnent jusqu'à plusieurs fois plus vite que ceux de n'importe quel individu ordinaire et un étrange sens d'insectes, une sensation de frisson à l'arrière de son cou, qui le met en garde contre le péril. Cependant, il est également humain. Quel autre surhumain réalisez-vous que des discussions avec lui-même, rate des arrangements, attrape la grippe saisonnière - quand il a besoin de se battre, néglige de placer le film dans sa caméra (Peter est un photographe en termes de carrière professionnelle) et il éprouve même des difficultés à payer son bail. De plus, j'accepte que ce sont ces choses qui font de lui notre saint préféré. Puisque Spider-Man est le héros qui pourrait être n'importe lequel d'entre nous. Quoi qu'il en soit, avez-vous réalisé que, aussi connu que Spider-Man est aujourd'hui - qu'il était au départ un test unique pour un arrangement de bande dessinée flétri et qu'il n'a absolument pas été imprimé du tout compte tenu du fait que le superviseur en contrôle de Marvel Comics a imaginé que des individus seraient tués en découvrant des bugs. En tout cas, puisque l'arrangement aurait été terminé de toute façon, Goodman a finalement consenti à laisser Spider-Man faire ses débuts en août 1962 dans Amazing Fantasy # 15. De plus, en 1970, Marvel Comics avait obtenu l'un des principaux distributeurs de bandes dessinées, avec Spider-Man comme arrangement "leader". Présenté comme Peter Parker, un virtuose de la science geek, incroyablement timide et considéré comme maladroit, ingrat et un grand faible, qui était continuellement harcelé. Bloqué à l'âge de quatre ans, lorsque ses parents ont été assassinés dans un accident d'avion, Peter a dû vivre avec sa vieille tante May et son oncle Ben. Un jour, lors d'une exposition scientifique, Peter a été grignoté par un crawly radio-dynamique et par la suite, il a des pouvoirs d'insectes, par exemple, une qualité répandue et des réflexes extrêmement rapides. Quoi qu'il en soit, être un héros et épargner les individus n'est pas vraiment ce que Peter avait comme priorité principale. Il était de plus en plus désireux d'apporter de l'argent avec ses nouveaux pouvoirs en tant que grappler expert, ce qui lui a valu une notoriété en tant que grande star de la télévision. À un moment donné, alors qu'il était au studio, Peter a été affronté par un voleur et, au lieu de tenter de l'attraper, Peter l'a laissé s'échapper. Tout bien considéré, ce n'était pas son affaire de l'arrêter - c'était à la police. C'était une triche similaire qui, peu de temps après, a tué le compagnon le plus proche de Peter, son oncle Ben. Diminish maintenant chargé de blâme, de ne pas avoir arrêté l'individu qui a exécuté son oncle. De plus, c'est cette contrainte qui conduira Spider-Man à travers le reste de sa profession de justicier.
30 Jun by Joseph Barnett

Reading Comics

A few ends of the week back I ended up in one of the more established shopping centers in the city. I've been heading off to this shopping center since the time I included my age in single digits, its been repaired and modified a few times however I can even now observe the shadow of the old shopping center when I take a gander at it. My family goes to this second hand store brimming with a gaggle of things: toys, sacks, sweets, magazines, devices - a wide range of stuff. It used to sell funnies. I used to simply have the option to pick an issue from the stands. Nowadays the stands just has magazines; not a comic book in sight. I purchased an issue of the Flash (Infantino/Heck issue) here just in the wake of viewing the film Flash Gordon. My Mom, seeing me with the comic stated: "You know the Flash (Gordon) you found in the film isn't equivalent to the Flash in that comic book right?". Obviously, Mom. I likewise recollect purchasing Starlin's Warlock from the racks and, perhaps in light of the fact that I was catching something in the first place, I recall that I felt lightheaded and wiped out taking a gander at the vigorously inked boards. The fact of the matter is, this was one of the stores that filled meshed my funnies into my life. I don't go in the second hand store any longer. There's nothing there for me. I simply hand my significant other some cash and hang tight for her and the children to come out. While I'm outside I go around at that piece of the shopping center and think back. There used to be a comic claim to fame shop on the lower level - gone. One more recycled comic shop on the third floor - gone as well; the spot is pressed with toy shops. On the opposite side of the shopping center was a spot called the Arcade and the primary comic shop I realize used to remain there. At the point when it shut others had its spot. At its stature, the Arcade had no under three comic stores. Presently, none. Nothing. Nothing. Just restaurants and antique furniture shops. The shopping center where I used to go to get my funnies fix had an aggregate of zero stores. It makes me miserable, however not for me, the city despite everything has comic book shops and I know where they are. It makes me miserable for all the youngsters who will pass up funnies, and the enchantment that perusing funnies can bring. Getting into those issues and gathering them was a feature of my young years. The children of today have what I didn't: computer games, motion pictures on dvd, some other stuff I don't think about. I'm practically certain that funnies won't be a staple, on the grounds that nowadays, you truly need to move to snatch an issue or two. Possibly the realistic books and exchange soft cover books the book shops will keep the diversion alive. I'm talking here not about the money related part of funnies as a business however the joy part of funnies as a leisure activity. I'm looking at understanding funnies and getting snared on something totally pleasant. Like all funnies darlings with access to the Internet I'm an eager peruser of funnies destinations and funnies audits on the web. There's a great deal of good and charming material out there, however there are additionally a significant measure of audits that are perplexing to me. I'm discussing funnies analysts who, I notice, are essentially miserable about anything that they read, or almost everything. These are perusers who set the bar so high that solitary a select bunch of funnies make their evaluation. It's their entitlement to state what they need and I don't resent them that. I'm astounded, in light of the fact that can any anyone explain why about everything except for (not the entirety) of the funnies I've perused are acceptable or extraordinary however similar funnies get shot down in the surveys? The appropriate response is, obviously, the emotional, profoundly close to home nature of audits. In any case, this focuses to a significantly greater truth about understanding funnies: If you read funnies in the soul of deficiency finding and with an attitude deadset on reprimanding and just detesting the work, at that point you won't appreciate it. You will find that deficiency, you will feel contemptuous of the work, you will think you squandered your cash and you will have a by and large horrendous experience. Notwithstanding some really horrible funnies out there ( we as a whole know about a couple), you will get into the read what you bring into it. In the event that you are available to making some great memories, in the event that you know a touch of the sheer ability and difficult work it takes to show, compose and alter a comic book; in the event that you search for the qualities of the work instead of the shortcomings, you are probably going to have a superb perused. A great deal of the pleasure in funnies relies upon the mentality of the peruser instead of the work itself (in spite of the fact that, I rehash, there are some really horrendous, choke commendable funnies out there). You need to give the medium a possibility. Hell, read like a little youngster, and accept, no - know, that you will appreciate it. Furthermore, you will - in light of the fact that you moved toward the work that way. In the event that you approach it with the end goal of doing a negative study, you'll find what you're searching for, on the grounds that the defects are there in everything except an extremely select gathering of funnies. At the present time I'm enthusiastically following a progressing work, "Evil spirit Knights", from DC's New 52; I'm additionally re-perusing an old arrangement from the mid 80's, Roy Thomas' "Elite player Squadron". The blemishes in the two works are exceptionally evident to me and I can decide to have a completely ghastly time by concentrating on those defects. In any case, a difference in approach on my part makes them center around the qualities of the arrangement; more than that, I wind up seeing what was at one time a blemish as a great whimsy or interesting part of the work - from this vantage point, comic book perusing is unadulterated pleasure and this diversion is enchantment. A ton truly relies upon my way to deal with it.